Stockholm+50 is being held in Stockholm, Sweden. It will commemorate the 50 years since the 1972 United Nations (UN) Conference on the Human Environment (also known as the Stockholm Conference).
The UN General Assembly will be convening this international meeting.
This is being held at a time when the world is facing a triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution and waste, nature and biodiversity loss, as well as other planetary issues even after 50 years of the Stockholm Declaration. This is threatening the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.
A sustainable recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic will also remain as one of agenda points.
WHAT IS STOCKHOLM CONFERENCE, 1972?
Background:
Climate change was first discussed using emerging scientific evidence in the UN General Assembly in 1968.
In 1967, a research study provided the actual estimates of global temperature based on CO2 levels. Also, it was predicted that the doubling of CO2 from the current level would result in nearly 2°C rise in global temperature.
The idea of the Stockholm Conference was first proposed by Sweden. That’s why it's also termed the “Swedish Initiative”.
About:
The United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm was held from 5th –16th June, 1972.
This was the first global convergence on the planetary environment.
The theme was ‘Only One Earth’.
122 countries participated in the conference.
Aim:
Creating a common governance framework for the planetary environment and natural resources.
Stockholm Declaration and Action Plan for the Human Environment
Stockholm Declaration:
70 out of 122 participant countries which were developing and poor countries adopted the Stockholm Declaration.
The Stockholm Declaration contained 26 principles that marked the beginning of a dialogue between developed and developing countries.
This built the “interconnections between development, poverty and the environment”.
Action Plan:
The Action Plan contained three main categories that were further broken down into 109 recommendations:
Global Environmental Assessment Programme (watch plan)
Environmental management activities
International measures to support assessment and management activities carried out at the national and international levels.
Three Dimension of the Conference:
Countries agreed to not “harm each other’s environment or the areas beyond national jurisdiction”.
An action plan to study the threat to Earth’s environment.
WHAT WERE THE KEY AGREEMENTS OF THE STOCKHOLM DECLARATION?
Natural resources such as air, water, land, flora and fauna must be safeguarded through careful planning for the benefit of the present and future generations.
The release of toxic substances and heat emissions should not be allowed to exceed the capacity of the environment.
The poor and developing nations must be supported in their struggle against pollution.
The environmental policies of the states should support the present or future development potential of developing countries.
Appropriate steps should be taken by States and international organisations to reach an agreement on meeting the possible national and international economic consequences resulting from the application of environmental measures.
According to the UN charter and principles of international law, the States have the sovereign right to exploit their own resources as per their own environmental policies.
However, the states have this responsibility of making sure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause any harm to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.
WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF STOCKHOLM, 1972?
The first global conference on the environment happened when the environment was not a global concern or a subject of importance for any nation.
Previously, the UN charter never contained the domain of environment to deal with.
No country had an environment ministry until 1972.
Afterwards, countries like Norway and Sweden set up their ministries for the environment.
In 1985, India set up its ministry of environment and forest.
After 1972, environmental issues like species extinction and mercury poisoning started making headlines and public consciousness increased.
The Stockholm conference started the contemporary “environmental era”.
Many of today's conventions on the environmental crises trace their origin to the Stockholm Declaration.
Since the very beginning, global politics impacted the conference adversely.
Some nations expressed their concerns regarding the dominance of rich countries and said that the policies are more in the interests of wealthier, industrialised countries.
An uncoordinated response from the nations has contributed to the fact that the world is on track to warm at least 3˚C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. This is twice the 1.5˚C warming as mandated in the Paris Agreement.
Within the next 50 years, 1-3 billion people are projected to be left outside the climate conditions.
Poverty is the biggest hurdle in the way of adopting sustainable measures for a healthy environment, as poverty can’t be eradicated without the use of science and technology.
Unless the poor or developing countries are in a position to provide employment and meet daily necessities of the people, the policies towards sustainable environment can’t be implemented appropriately.
WAY FORWARD
Majority of the world needs to understand that ecology and conservation will not work against their interests. Instead, this will bring an improvement in their lives.
The industrialised nations are basically worried about air and water pollution, whereas developing nations are hoping for assistance to eradicate poverty without causing ecosystem damage.
Therefore, measures for environment protection must be adopted ensuring the upliftment of developing countries’ economies.
As the time is already running out, it is a high time for Stockholm+50 for setting specific deadlines for realizing the goals driven towards a sustainable environment.
Source:DTE
ISRAEL SIGNED A FREE TRADE DEAL WITH THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES- ITS FIRST WITH AN ARAB COUNTRY
Recently, Israel signed a free trade deal with the United Arab Emirates, its first with an Arab country, building on their US-brokered normalization of relations in 2020.
The UAE was the first Gulf country to normalize ties with Israel and only the third Arab nation to do so after Egypt and Jordan.
WHAT ARE THE KEY HIGHLIGHTS?
Trade between the Two Countries: In comparison to 2020, Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics recorded more than a 30% increase in import and export of goods, excluding diamonds, to and from the United Arab Emirates.
Two-way trade in 2021 totaled some USD 900 million.
Non-oil trade surpassed reached USD 1.06 billion in the first three months of 2022 - a fivefold increase from the same period last year.
Significance of the Free Trade Deal:
Builds on the US-brokered Normalisation of Relations: The deal shows the durability of a series of diplomatic deals in 2020 known as the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and four Muslim countries—the U.A.E., Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan.
Great Economic Potential:
Israel's relationship with the UAE has great economic potential due to the geographic and cultural proximity between the peoples, as well as the UAE’s unique characteristics.
The UAE is the second largest economy in the Arab world (after Saudi Arabia), with significant weight placed on technology products and advanced solutions, where Israel holds a relative advantage.
Faster Access to Markets and Lower Tariffs:
Businesses in both countries will benefit from faster access to markets and lower tariffs as these nations work together to increase trade, create jobs, promote new skills and deepen cooperation.
The deal abolishes customs duties on 96% of the products exchanged between the two sides.
The agreement also relates to regulatory and standardisation issues, customs, collaboration, government procurement, e-commerce and intellectual property rights.
Boost up Trade:
This deal will push the value of non-oil bilateral trade between Israel and the UAE beyond $10 billion.
UAE-Israel trade will exceed $2 billion in 2022, rising to around $5 billion in five years, bolstered by collaboration in renewables, consumer goods, tourism and the life sciences sectors.
Israel can Gain foothold in International Market:
A long-term hope for both countries is that Israeli companies will set up manufacturing in the U.A.E., which serves as a hub for the Middle East, Asia and Africa—markets where Israel has struggled to gain a foothold.
It has also further created opportunities for collaborations in different fields with the US.
These were made possible by the Abraham Accords, which have been a significant turning point in promoting peace and prosperity for all.
Israel, India, the UAE, and the US are also part of a new grouping, West Asian Quad which was established as a forum for economic cooperation.
They are pursuing a constructive agenda focused on the economy, especially infrastructure projects.
WHAT IS A FREE TRADE AGREEMENT?
FTAs are arrangements between two or more countries or trading blocs that primarily agree to reduce or eliminate customs tariff and non-tariff barriers on substantial trade between them.
FTAs normally cover trade in goods (such as agricultural or industrial products) or trade in services (such as banking, construction, trading etc.).
FTAs can also cover other areas such as intellectual property rights (IPRs), investment, government procurement and competition policy etc.
Example: India has negotiated FTA with many countries e.g. Sri Lanka and various trading blocs as well e.g. ASEAN.
This trade agreement with Israel will create a new paradigm for the West Asian region, and represents the importance of building significant partnerships.
This will offer significant diplomatic ties in the near future and help in overcoming the long conflicts in the Middle East region between Israel and many countries of West Asia.
India will oppose the continuation of a moratorium on Customs Duties on electronic transmission (E-Transmission) at the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) 12th Ministerial Conference (MC12) starting in June 2022 as it favors developed nations only.
The moratorium was extended at the 11th MC in Argentina in 2017 for two years. In the General Council meeting in December 2019, members agreed to maintain the current practice till the 12th MC.
WHAT IS THE E-TRANSMISSION MORATORIUM?
The WTO members had agreed not to impose customs duties on electronic transmissions since 1998 and the moratorium has been periodically extended at successive Ministerial Conferences (MC), which is the highest decision making body of the 164-member organisation (WTO).
The moratorium is on digitisable products like photographic films, cinematographic films, printed matter, music, media, software, and video games.
In 1998, ministers at the Second Ministerial Conference adopted the Declaration on Global Electronic Commerce, calling for the establishment of a work programme on e-commerce, which was adopted later that year.
Since most countries didn’t have concrete policies on e-commerce, which was an emerging area of trade in even developed countries in 1998, they had decided to establish a work programme on it to hold intensive talks and impose a moratorium on customs duties on electronics transmission.
In 1998, the General Council of the WTO established the work programme on e-commerce to comprehensively examine all trade-related issues pertaining to global e-commerce by considering the economic, financial and development needs of emerging economies.
The WTO Work Programme on electronic commerce defines electronic commerce” as the “production, distribution, marketing, sale or delivery of goods and services by electronic means.”
WHAT DOES INDIA SEEK AT THE MEETING?
At the 12th MC in June 2022, many WTO members are seeking temporary extension of the moratorium till 13th MC but India does not want this time to continue this further.
India and South Africa on several occasions have asked the organization to revisit the issue and have highlighted the adverse impact of the moratorium on developing countries.
India wants the WTO to intensify the work programme on the e-commerce sector.
India has also stated that the Council for Trade in Goods, Council for Trade in Services, Council for TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) and the Committee for Trade and Development should take up discussions on e-commerce as per their respective mandates originally set.
India believed that formal negotiations in the WTO on rules and disciplines in e-commerce would be premature given the highly asymmetrical nature of the existing global e-commerce space and lack of understanding on the implications of the multi-faceted dimensions of issues related to the sector.
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WITH THE MORATORIUM?
India is witnessing an exponential rise in imports of electronic transmissions, mainly of items like movies, music, video games and printed matter, some of which could fall within the scope of the moratorium.
Allowing the moratorium to lapse is important for developing nations to preserve policy space for their digital advancement, to regulate imports and generate revenue through customs duties.
The potential tariff revenue loss to developing countries is estimated at USD 10 billion annually.
While the profits and revenues of digital players are rising steadily, the ability of governments to check these imports and generate additional tariff revenues is being ‘severely’ limited because of the moratorium on e-commerce.
It will have impact on industrialization, on the use of digital technologies like 3D printing in manufacturing and losses of other duties and charges.
WAY FORWARD
Developing countries need to preserve flexibility to implement policies to catch up with the developed countries in the digital arena. We first need to focus on improving domestic physical and digital infrastructure.
It's extremely important for developing countries to regulate their luxury imports of movies, music, and video games. Removal of the moratorium will provide this policy space to governments.
Recently, Bihar government has announced that it will undertake a socio-economic survey of all castes and communities (SECC).
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CENSUS AND SECC?
Census:
The origin of the Census in India goes back to the colonial exercise of 1881.
Census has evolved and been used by the government, policymakers, academics, and others to capture the Indian population, access resources, map social change, delimitation exercise, etc.
However, as early as the 1940s, W.W.M. Yeatts, Census Commissioner for India for the 1941 Census, had pointed out that “the census is a large, immensely powerful, but blunt instrument unsuited for specialized inquiry.”
SECC:
The Socio-Economic and Caste Census (SECC) was conducted in 2011 for the first time since 1931.
SECC is meant to canvass every Indian family, both in rural and urban India, and ask about their:
Economic status, so as to allow Central and State authorities to come up with a range of indicators of deprivation, permutations, and combinations of which could be used by each authority to define a poor or deprived person.
It is also meant to ask every person their specific caste name to allow the government to re-evaluate which caste groups were economically worse off and which were better off.
SECC has the potential to allow for a mapping of inequalities at a broader level.
Difference Between Census & SECC:
The Census provides a portrait of the Indian population, while the SECC is a tool to identify beneficiaries of state support.
Since the Census falls under the Census Act of 1948, all data are considered confidential, whereas according to the SECC website, “all the personal information given in the SECC is open for use by Government departments to grant and/or restrict benefits to households.”
WHAT ARE THE PROS AND CONS OF CONDUCTING CASTE BASED CENSUS?
Pros:
Helpful in Managing Social Equity Programmes:
India's social equality programmes cannot be a success without the data and a caste census would help fix that.
Due to the lack of data, there is no proper estimate for the population of OBCs, groups within the OBCs and more.
The Mandal Commission estimated the OBC population at 5% while some others have pinned the OBC population from 36 to 65%.
The census would 'besides resolving the needless mystery about the size of the OBC population, census enumeration would yield a wealth of demographic information (sex ratio, mortality rate, life expectancy), educational data (male and female literacy, ratio of school-going population, number of graduates) and policy relevant information about economic conditions (house-type, assets, occupation) of the OBCs'.
Bring a Measure of Objectivity on Reservation:
A caste-based census could go a long way in bringing a measure of objectivity to the debate on reservations.
According to the Rohini Commission, which was formed to look into equitable redistribution of the 27% quota for OBCs, noted that there are around 2,633 castes covered under the OBC reservation.
However, the Centre’s reservation policy from 1992 doesn’t take into account that there exists within the OBCs, a separate category of Extremely Backward Castes, who are much more marginalised.
Cons:
Repercussions of a Caste Census:
Caste has an emotive element and thus there exist the political and social repercussions of a caste census.
There have been concerns that counting caste may help solidify or harden identities.
Due to these repercussions, nearly a decade after the SECC 2011, a sizable amount of its data remains unreleased or released only in parts.
Caste Is Context-specific:
Caste has never been a proxy for class or deprivation in India, it constitutes a distinct kind of embedded discrimination that often transcends class. For example:
People with Dalit last names are less likely to be called for job interviews even when their qualifications are better than that of an upper-caste candidate.
They are also less likely to be accepted as tenants by landlords. Thus, difficult to measure.
Marriage to a well- educated, well-off Dalit man still sparks violent reprisals among the families of upper-caste women every day across the country.
WAY FORWARD
A caste census may not sit well with the goal of a casteless society, but it may serve as a means of addressing inequities in society.
Caste data will enable independent research not only into the question of who does and does not need affirmative action but also into the effectiveness of this measure.
Impartial data and subsequent research might save the bona fide attempts of the uplift of the most backward classes from the shadow of caste and class politics and be informative to people on both sides of the spectrum – for and against reservation.
It is not reservation that creates the current divide in our society but the misuse or the perceived misuse of reservation.
Source:TH
CAUSES & CONSEQUENCES OF RIVER AVULSIONS AND THE WAY FORWARD
Recently a research study reported that instability in Kosi River has been observed after the construction of embankments on either side of it.
WHAT ARE AVULSIONS?
About:
Avulsion refers to the phenomenon of change in the course of river flow causing the abandonment of the old established river channel and formation of a new channel.
Occurrence:
Rivers lining tropical and desert regions are more prone to avulsions.
Avulsions occur less frequently, only once a decade or century, or even less.
The rare occurrence of avulsions makes them less discussed despite their catastrophic effects as compared to more frequent extreme weather events and the continuous effect of sea-level rise.
WHAT ARE THE KEY FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH STUDY?
Global Scenario:
113 avulsions have been documented worldwide as per the satellite imagery from 1973-2020 and historical maps.
Rivers altered routes in the mountain bases while descending onto unconfined valleys or open oceans in 33 instances.
Kosi river falls under this category.
The change can also occur in the delta regions. One is along backwater zones, part of the river that flows differently because of the effects of the downstream sea.
Along some of the world’s largest waterways, such as the Orinoco, Yellow, Nile and Mississippi Rivers, 50 instances occurred on low sloping deltas.
In 30 instances, avulsions occurred in rivers with extreme sediment load. River beds are filled-up with the sediments causing the rivers to seek new channels during floods.
Case-study of Kosi River:
Kosi-like systems bring a lot of sediments from the Himalayas. After embankments were made on either side of the river in the 1950s, it became much more unstable.
In 2008, a large flood forced the Kosi River to leave its established channel for an older one. As a result, 3 million people were displaced and more than 250 human lives were claimed.
Kosi river avulsions are not at all natural. The 200 km stretch where the river used to distribute sediments before the embankment-construction has now been reduced to 10 km.
Though the course of sediment-flow has not altered, the area available for its movement has contracted.
Only a false perception of protection is created due to temporary solutions like embankments. Instead, these aggravate system-scale degradation by limiting natural sediment dispersal.
WHAT IS THE KOSI RIVER SYSTEM?
The Kosi is a trans-boundary river which flows through Tibet, Nepal and India.
It has its source in Tibet that includes the world's highest upland, it then drains a large part of Nepal before emerging onto the Gangetic plains.
Its three major tributaries, the Sun Kosi, Arun and Tamur meet at one point just upstream of a 10 km gorge cut through the Himalayan foothills.
The river crosses into northern Bihar, India where it branches into distributaries before joining the Ganges near Kursela in Katihar district.
The Kosi carries the maximum amount of silt and sand after the Brahmaputra in India.
It is also known as the “Sorrow of Bihar” as the annual floods affect about 21,000 sq. km. of fertile agricultural lands thereby disturbing the rural economy.
WHAT IS THE KOSI RIVER SYSTEM?
The Kosi is a trans-boundary river which flows through Tibet, Nepal and India.
It has its source in Tibet that includes the world's highest upland, it then drains a large part of Nepal before emerging onto the Gangetic plains.
Its three major tributaries, the Sun Kosi, Arun and Tamur meet at one point just upstream of a 10 km gorge cut through the Himalayan foothills.
The river crosses into northern Bihar, India where it branches into distributaries before joining the Ganges near Kursela in Katihar district.
The Kosi carries the maximum amount of silt and sand after the Brahmaputra in India.
It is also known as the “Sorrow of Bihar” as the annual floods affect about 21,000 sq. km. of fertile agricultural lands thereby disturbing the rural economy.
WAY FORWARD
Approximately 330 million people reside on river deltas worldwide, and even more live along river corridors. Hence, it is high time to understand how climate change and anthropogenic interference is affecting river mobility.
A complete global picture must be captured to understand the correlation between climate change and river avulsions. The course of river jump in delta regions can be altered by climate change, such as, avulsions can be pushed farther inland in the backwater zone on account of rising sea levels.
The role of embankments/barriers that are created along rivers for protection against floods must be understood with regards to avulsion-trigger.
Various engineering interventions can be employed to create additional channels for rivers. This will prevent floods and avulsions by distributing the flow of the water and sediments across channels.
Source:DTE
INDIA'S EIGHT CORE SECTOR INDUSTRIES SHOWED A ROBUST GROWTH OF 8.4%
The eight core sector industries in decreasing order of their weightage are: Refinery Products> Electricity> Steel> Coal> Crude Oil> Natural Gas> Cement> Fertilizers.
It evaluates the combined as well as individual performance of production in selected eight core industries.
The current weightage (April 2021), of eight core industries is given below:
Petroleum Refinery production (28.04%), Electricity (19.85%), Steel (17.92%), Coal production (10.33%), Crude Oil (8.98%), Natural Gas production (6.88%), Cement production (5.37%), Fertilizer production (2.63%).
ICI provides advance indication on production performance of industries of ‘core’ nature prior to the IIP release by the National Statistical Office, NSO.
General economic activities and industrial activities are likely to get impacted by the eight core industries.
WHAT IS THE INDEX OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION?
About:
Index of Industrial Production (IIP) is an indicator that measures the changes in the volume of production of industrial products during a given period.
Theme for 2022: People. Peace. Progress. The Power of Partnerships.
WHAT IS UN PEACEKEEPING?
About:
UN Peacekeeping began in 1948 when the UN Security Council authorized the deployment of UN military observers to the Middle East.
UN Peacekeeping helps countries navigate the difficult path from conflict to peace.
It deploys troops and police from around the world, integrating them with civilian peacekeepers to address a range of mandates set by the UN Security Council (UNSC) and the General Assembly.
Composition:
UN peacekeepers (often referred to as Blue Berets or Blue Helmets because of their light blue berets or helmets) can include soldiers, police officers, and civilian personnel.
Peacekeeping forces are contributed by member states on a voluntary basis.
Civilian staff of peace operations are international civil servants, recruited and deployed by the UN Secretariat.
UN Peacekeeping and India:
India has been among the largest troop-contributing countries to the UN peacekeeping missions. As of November 2021, India is the second-highest military (1,888) and fifth-highest (139) police-contributing country to the United Nations Organisation Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO).
More than 200,000 Indians have served in 49 of the 71 UN peacekeeping missions established around the world since 1948.
India has a long tradition of sending women on UN peacekeeping missions.
In 2007, India became the first country to deploy an all-women contingent to a UN peacekeeping mission.
Despite its presence in several countries as part of the Peacekeeping missions, India has routinely expressed its displeasure at a similar mission headquartered in Srinagar and Islamabad.
The United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) was established in January, 1949 to supervise the ceasefire between India and Pakistan.
India has reiterated that the mission has “outlived its relevance” after the Simla Agreement was signed by India and Pakistan in July 1972 and the establishment of the LoC (Line of Control).